2026 Second/Third Division Darts selections

So, with the Premier League lineup being chosen, which I think is probably the best they could have done with it, we can go into the 2nd/3rd division picks for 2026:

Division Two:

On last season's rankings - Gary Anderson, Ross Smith

On last season's third division rankings - Wessel Nijman

On year end FRH rankings - Ryan Searle, James Wade, Danny Noppert, Nathan Aspinall

Wildcard one - Chris Dobey (highest player not in on both 2025 scoring and 2025 FRH rankings)

Wildcard two - Jermaine Wattimena (second highest in FRH rankings not in, fourth in 2025 scoring from those not already selected anywhere)

Wildcard three - Damon Heta (real shortage of players who have a combination of scoring as well as ranking, Heta has the latter but not really the former, but was in the top half of last year's second division so will give another shot)

Division Three:

On last season's rankings - Niels Zonneveld, Niko Springer

World youth champion - in Premier League

On year end FRH rankings - Martin Schindler, Kevin Doets, Callan Rydz, Connor Scutt

Wildcard one - Beau Greaves (world championship runner up, very dominant Challenge/Development Tour season, looks like she can compete at this level already)

Wildcard two - Sebastian Bialecki (solid Development Tour season, has shown very high peak, Pro Tour winner)

Wildcard three - Bradley Brooks (hugely improved over last 12-18 months, Pro Tour winner, highest scoring of anyone not selected who isn't likely to get a ban in the near future)

Wildcard four - Cam Crabtree (Development Tour winner, most sensible pick when looking at combination of rankings and scoring)

Always tricky to pick the last couple at each ranking, and next year in division three it might get tougher given there are a lot of players hitting 30 this year and hence making themselves ineligible for the next season. In terms of division two, Dirk and Cross had good scoring but I feel lacked results, Schindler was close on ranking but Heta had much better scoring to compensate for the one position difference. Woodhouse was behind Heta in more or less any metric I looked at, only mention him as another top 20 FRH player, de Decker is actually outscoring him but is only really holding on to a top 20 spot from his major last year. Third division was a bit less controversial. Although not listed in that order, Bialecki probably was the closest to getting bumped, Meikle has a decent ranking and is outscoring Bialecki a touch, but I'm going to give Sebastian the nudge having won an event this year and possibly I feel taking a big step in a second year of a tour card. I'd maybe have considered Manby or van den Herik if we knew they were getting cards, but we don't, get on the tour and have a steady season and you'll be in consideration. Not sure anyone else with an actual card already was under real consideration, maybe Dominik Gruellich is the only other name, but I don't think he's done that much outside of that Pro Tour final, everyone else in did more for me.

End of tournament thoughts and end of year FRH rankings

So, Littler wins to nobody's surprise. That he won the final quite that easily might have been a bit of a surprise, while it's no secret that I'm much more bullish on Littler than most, Gian only winning the first set did come as a bit of a shock. In any case, the tournament is in the book and we rush straight to Q-School tomorrow, no rest for the wicked. New FRH rankings, I did just note that I didn't put any new ones up after the Players Championship Finals, probably just rushing to start on worlds previews not knowing how long they would take with the expanded field, so changes are since the Slam:

1 Luke Littler

2 Gian van Veen (UP 2)

3 Luke Humphries (DOWN 1)

4 Jonny Clayton (UP 2)

5 Gary Anderson (UP 13)

6 Ryan Searle (UP 14)

7 Michael van Gerwen (DOWN 4)

8 Josh Rock (UP 2)

9 James Wade (DOWN 1)

10 Stephen Bunting (DOWN 5)

11 Danny Noppert (DOWN 4)

12 Gerwyn Price (DOWN 3)

13 Nathan Aspinall (UP 2)

14 Chris Dobey (DOWN 3)

15 Jermaine Wattimena (UP 1)

16 Martin Schindler (DOWN 2)

17 Damon Heta (DOWN 4)

18 Ross Smith (DOWN 6)

19 Luke Woodhouse (NEW)

20 Mike de Decker (DOWN 3)

Only Nijman to drop out from there, if you will go out early then what can you do. As an added bonus, here's the year on year changes:

Rank	Player	Points	Last Year	Change
1	Luke Littler	2.23m	2	1
2	Gian van Veen	780k	27	25
3	Luke Humphries	722k	1	-2
4	Jonny Clayton	463k	9	5
5	Gary Anderson	438k	12	7
6	Ryan Searle	418k	18	12
7	Michael van Gerwen	412k	3	-4
8	Josh Rock	405k	17	9
9	James Wade	404k	10	1
10	Stephen Bunting	401k	4	-6
11	Danny Noppert	399k	13	2
12	Gerwyn Price	395k	16	4
13	Nathan Aspinall	354k	23	10
14	Chris Dobey	337k	5	-9
15	Jermaine Wattimena	307k	30	15
16	Martin Schindler	299k	22	6
17	Damon Heta	289k	8	-9
18	Ross Smith	282k	14	-4
19	Luke Woodhouse	275k	31	12
20	Mike de Decker	253k	11	-9
21	Krzysztof Ratajski	252k	34	13
22	Wessel Nijman	250k	43	21
23	Rob Cross	246k	6	-17
24	Daryl Gurney	235k	24	0
25	Ryan Joyce	233k	25	0
26	Dirk van Duijvenbode	230k	32	6
27	Cameron Menzies	225k	38	11
28	Dave Chisnall	218k	7	-21
29	Andrew Gilding	207k	29	0
30	Peter Wright	201k	15	-15
31	Ricardo Pietreczko	199k	28	-3
32	Joe Cullen	184k	26	-6
33	Michael Smith	178k	21	-12
34	Ritchie Edhouse	175k	20	-14
35	Raymond van Barneveld	154k	33	-2
36	Kevin Doets	153k	42	6
37	Justin Hood	137k	NEW	NEW
38	Dimitri van den Bergh	136k	19	-19
39	Willie O'Connor	135k	57	18
40	Martin Lukeman	130k	36	-4
41	Niels Zonneveld	130k	48	7
42	Niko Springer	126k	NEW	NEW
43	Callan Rydz	123k	40	-3
44	Ricky Evans	122k	45	1
45	Scott Williams	114k	37	-8
46	James Hurrell	113k	74	28
47	Madars Razma	110k	44	-3
48	Brendan Dolan	110k	35	-13
49	Gabriel Clemens	101k	39	-10
50	Michael Mansell	101k	41	-9
51	Connor Scutt	98.5k	46	-5
52	Wesley Plaisier	94.2k	54	2
53	Jeffrey de Graaf	93.5k	47	-6
54	Karel Sedlacek	91.9k	66	12
55	Ian White	89.7k	51	-4
56	Mensur Suljovic	88.7k	65	9
57	Ryan Meikle	86.4k	64	7
58	Alan Soutar	83.4k	60	2
59	Lukas Wenig	82.2k	NEW	NEW
60	Keane Barry	78.2k	53	-7
61	Andreas Harrysson	76.1k	NEW	NEW
62	Richard Veenstra	75.7k	50	-12
63	Nick Kenny	72.9k	62	-1
64	Dom Taylor	72.6k	76	12
65	Bradley Brooks	72.1k	NEW	NEW
66	Kim Huybrechts	70.4k	49	-17
67	Cameron Crabtree	70.4k	NEW	NEW
68	Mario Vandenbogaerde	68.4k	68	0
69	Thibault Tricole	67.3k	59	-10
70	Darren Beveridge	63.8k	NEW	NEW
71	Charlie Manby	62.5k	NEW	NEW
72	Sebastian Bialecki	59.2k	NEW	NEW
73	Stephen Burton	57.1k	63	-10
74	Matt Campbell	57.0k	61	-13
75	Max Hopp	54.9k	NEW	NEW
76	Robert Owen	54.9k	58	-18
77	Chris Landman	54.6k	72	-5
78	Adam Lipscombe	50.1k	NEW	NEW
79	Matthew Dennant	49.0k	NEW	NEW
80	Steve Lennon	48.9k	73	-7
81	Stefan Bellmont	48.5k	100	19
82	Darius Labanauskas	46.1k	NEW	NEW
83	Andy Baetens	44.4k	96	13
84	Florian Hempel	42.5k	52	-32
85	Owen Bates	42.4k	95	10
86	Adam Hunt	42.0k	NEW	NEW
87	Cor Dekker	41.2k	NEW	NEW
88	Dominik Gruellich	39.7k	NEW	NEW
89	Dylan Slevin	37.8k	67	-22
90	Jose de Sousa	37.6k	56	-34
91	Arno Merk	37.6k	NEW	NEW
92	Leonard Gates	37.5k	90	-2
93	Mervyn King	37.3k	77	-16
94	Jurjen van der Velde	34.9k	NEW	NEW
95	Beau Greaves	32.0k	NEW	NEW
96	Haupai Puha	31.8k	NEW	NEW
97	Jamai van den Herik	31.5k	NEW	NEW
98	Maik Kuivenhoven	31.2k	79	-19
99	Alexis Toylo	31.1k	NEW	NEW
100	David Davies	31.0k	NEW	NEW

23 players out, which is a lot more than last year relatively speaking, seems to be a lot less churn in the top 50, think that's somewhat down to the Euro Tour but not entirely sure. Jim Williams is the biggest casualty from 55, but then you need to go down to last year's #69 to see anyone else drop, 18 of the 23 players we lost were from the bottom 25. Clearly a lot of those were either players who got into the worlds and did nothing else, or those that were doing so-so on the tour but lost their card. One thing to note is how much the points tally has increased year on year. Number 100 is up over 50%, #75 nearly 40%, #50 is up about a third, but the top 32 and 16 tallies have not changed much at all. How much of that is Littler getting ALL the cake is unclear.

Betting went well, we ended up punting on nearly half the matches and grew the bankroll by 44%, which is pretty solid. Some games were slip ups for sure, but we're never going to go perfect and I can't complain with how things went in the slightest.

The Q-School entry list is out, it looks like it's going to be a moderately even split, so I'm going to pick 12 names from each - more than what will get cards, but as it looks fairly close as to the exact breakdown then I'll not pick a full list. So:

UK - Charlie Manby, Darren Beveridge, Steve Lennon, Adam Hunt, George Killington, Stephen Burton, David Davies, Conor Heneghan, Shane McGuirk, Stephen Rosney, Martin Thomas, Graham Usher

EU - Jamai van den Herik, Andreas Harrysson, Florian Hempel, Andy Baetens, Mario Vandenbogaerde, Teemu Harju, Krzysztof Kciuk, Benjamin Pratnemer, Brian Raman, Franz Roetzsch, Jeffrey Sparidaans, Jimmy van Schie

We'll see how that goes. Usually it does not go well. Will be back tomorrow to confirm the 2nd/3rd Division lineups for 2026 once the PL announcement is in the bank. Really not sure where they're going to go with that, with quite a few players possibly playing themselves out of spots at the worlds, but we'll see. I just hope they don't snub Rock, that's the main one for me.

Final thoughts

Well, the semis kind of went how we thought, Littler winning super comfortably, then Gary was probably not as big a dog as the market thought, and but for some critical missed doubles, we might have been at 5-5, but we weren't, so oh well. As such, we go into a final where the projection is as follows:

72/84/80/79

This puts Littler at a near 4-1 on favourite. He is nowhere near a 4-1 on favourite in the market. This is EXACTLY what we saw last year against MvG. GvV is one of the few players that might be able to pressure Luke, but over this sort of game, it is just not happening anywhere near as often as the market thinks it will happen. Which is a shame, as I want Gian to win the match, but even in the form sample, Luke would be a bet. So we will bet the favourite, and expect to collect in 24 hours from now.

Semi final thoughts

Firstly, PRAISE THE SUN in that the PDC will finally be doing the thing where they top up stage 2 of Q-School on the second and subsequent days with people who just missed out from stage 1 so we get a full 128. This is long overdue and a change that makes a lot of sense. There's a few other small things which I might get into in another post, but credit where it's due. Now, into the penultimate day - I'll be updating the Second/Third Division Darts page with anything that might have happened (I know that, at a minimum, we had Schindler play Barry), there's one last potential game if we get a Searle/Ando final, but...

Littler/Searle - Luke into the semi finals as easily as expected. Krzysztof didn't play badly, he was just outclassed, as frankly all but maybe one or two players in the field would be. Searle looked confident, but he certainly wasn't harmed by Clayton starting off atrociously on the doubles, and really not getting much better later in the game. This one might not be as one sided as the other Littler games we've had, but it should still be incredibly straight forward. Projections - 88/90/85/88

van Veen/Anderson - We thought Gian would win that quarter final. We didn't think he would win it quite as comfortably as he did. Ando's was also very comfortable, Hood didn't even win a leg on the sets where Anderson had the throw, and were it not for a little bit of sloppy finishing/scoring in set four, this one could have ended just as quick. Projections - 59/49/49/52

So in terms of value, I think we need to look at Ando. I'm seeing it as a lot closer to 50/50 than the market is which has got Gary at longer than 6/4. I'm toning down the percentage play given that the short form number is clearly the one that favours Gian the most, and given yesterday's performances, but it's not going to take me off Anderson completely. After all, there is the intangible that he has been here before. Gian hasn't. It might not make a difference but it is still a thing to be considered (that, and post-Luke win hangover ideals that we often saw after someone beat Phil back in the day).

Quarter final thoughts

Searle/Clayton - Been a really comfortable couple of rounds for Ryan, taking out Schindler and then Hurrell without dropping a set, and not really being in a position where he was looking like dropping a set either. Clayton has had to work a lot more, being forced all the way by Zonneveld and nearly having Harrysson doing the same, so if Searle having more in the tank is actually a thing in darts, it might be a thing. Projection - 55/44/47/49

Anderson/Hood - Ando's been the only player forced into overtime in rounds three or four with what looked like a probable close one with Wattimena ending up being just that, while the next round against van Gerwen was a bit closer than what the scoreline showed but still a lot more comfortable than the previous round. Hood's run has been remarkable, comfortably beating Meikle as expected, then even more comfortably beating Rock, not as expected. Projection - 72/78/83/78

Littler/Ratajski - Luke had no problems with Suljovic much as we thought. Cross made him work a bit more but it never felt like Luke was in trouble, Krzsyztof needed everything to get through Plaisier, and then a fair bit to get through Woodhouse, this of course after not having everything his own way in round two either. Big step up, and likely not going to happen. Projection - 98/98/94/97

Humphries/van Veen - Luke was made to work a bit against Clemens, although only after he was already 3-0 up so had plenty in hand to work with, while Doets couldn't really do much after getting the first set. Gian meanwhile had fairly comfortable games against Razma and Manby, not really being pressured and likely being able to put in more like he did in round two if needed, which it wasn't. Projection - 44/53/56/51

So we've got two where things rate extremely tightly, one which doesn't and then one which really, really doesn't. That last game is the clear highlight.

Round four projections

Tomorrow's will come in later tonight at some point after the Rock game, but for now I'll just put out projections for the Littler and Hurrell games:

Hurrell/Searle - 18/26/23/22

Littler/Cross - 96/89/84/90

Edit to put in the 30th games:

Woodhouse/Ratajski - 60/59/45/55

Clayton/Harrysson - 94/89/90/91

Hood/Rock - 32/17/16/22

Manby/van Veen - 14/21/15/17

van Gerwen/Anderson - 51/44/47/47

Humphries/Doets - 83/79/87/83

Round three projections

We're now at the stage where everyone has very good levels of data, except for Merk, who remains extremely limited short term and limited otherwise, so take that one under advisement, otherwise, here we go:

Plaisier/Ratajski - 69/68/44/60

Gilding/Woodhouse - 48/63/57/56

Clayton/Zonneveld - 63/70/69/67

Harrysson/Pietreczko - 39/49/39/42

Bunting/Hurrell - 89/87/84/87

Littler/Suljovic - 97/96/95/96

Schindler/Searle - 19/31/33/28

Heta/Cross - 64/43/39/49

Anderson/Wattimena - 73/67/68/69

van Veen/Razma - 94/90/82/89

Humphries/Clemens - 96/95/91/94

van Gerwen/Merk - 90/99/100/96

Hood/Meikle - 80/75/72/76

Evans/Manby - 55/48/53/52

Aspinall/Doets - 79/74/72/75

Rock/Rydz - 70/82/74/75

I suppose the ones that immediately look odd are the Plaisier game, given he's currently the underdog on the market, I think that one can be tempered somewhat given consistency numbers, Wesley's pretty much at database average since June, but Ratajski is barely over one point, which is an extremely low number, as such while Plaisier is scoring more per turn, overall it's only by half a point, made up of two better on winning legs but two worse on losing legs. The other one is Schindler being that much of a dog to Searle. This one I think is harder to explain - Schindler's more consistent but there's only about a point and a quarter between the two, it's just a combination of year long Searle scoring a point and a half per turn more than Schindler does, and that goes to over two when you look at winning legs, which is how I derive these numbers. Searle's in the top ten in the world in the percentage of legs he finishes in four visits, at 16% compared to Schindler's 12%, while his five visit percent is 65% against Schindler being just under 60%, and he has a small edge in six visit percentage as well. Over what's now first to four sets, that edge in every leg being played over and over is going to be hard to overcome. I think maybe we chuck out that short term data sample - Searle's inconsistency number is very high there at over 9 (Schindler is just under 3), so maybe we just use the two longer samples and say the shortest one should really be around where the other two are. Even then, that still points to him being a fair price of around 1.5 when he's 1.8 right now. Have a good Christmas all, I'll probably just post a round 4 projections post after the first two days are in the book, and not write up until the 31st as it's going to be manic.