There's been a bit more meat on the bones in relation to the calendar, and boy, choices were made, but that's a problem for future TA Towers and we've got the Grand Prix to project. Now as I mentioned above, I don't actually have a specific setting in the master computer for a best of two sets match. Presumably I thought as that only happens in a double start event where my data doesn't have a direct exact similar computation, let's not bother. But I'll treat this as a best of 11 match. For one, you need to win six legs in this, and for two, a first two three set match (which I do have projected) appears very similar in win chances to a best of 17/19 game in leg play, so it seems close enough. We're only talking a fraction of a percentage difference in any case. As always, I'll give four numbers - the win chance using data from the last three completed months (plus September), then 6+ months, then the last year, and finally an average of the three.
Littler/Woodhouse - 85/78/81/81
Aspinall/Doets - 65/60/59/58
Noppert/Springer - 61/55/62/59
van Gerwen/Joyce - 69/71/74/71
Price/Bialecki - 76/77/82/78
Smith/Menzies - 52/55/56/54
Clayton/Ratajski - 68/55/58/60
Nijman/Cross - 53/57/62/57
Humphries/Chisnall - 70/74/81/75
Dobey/Wattimena - 70/63/63/65
Rock/Zonneveld - 54/54/56/55
Anderson/Heta - 56/67/69/64
van Veen/van Duijvenbode - 50/46/55/50
Searle/O'Connor - 64/60/64/63
Wade/Cullen - 68/58/57/61
Bunting/Gilding - 67/59/63/63
Looks like there might be some value in some places, but I've got Challenge Tour etc to catch up on.
No comments:
Post a Comment